A Pasquali Law Article

San Mateo (650)579-0100
San Francisco (415)841-1000
Attorney Bio
Courtroom Skills
Cross Examination


More Articles in the Pasquali Library


Terms of Use

NOTICE: Each article listed on this page is an original written by Rolando Pasquali; many were published in legal journals and in newspapers of general circulation. Each article is based upon general principles of California Law in existence at the time that it was written. Since the law constantly changes, some or all of the information in these articles might be out of date. Even a small difference in facts can change how the law applies to any situation. No information in any article or on this website constitutes legal advice. Neither these articles nor anything on this website creates an attorney-client relationship between you and this office. If you need legal advice, contact this office or an attorney in your area. To read an article, click on its title. Client testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. This website is from an attorney licensed to practice law in California.

Follow these Resource Links for Small Business Owners

Pasquali Law Original Article Dividing Real Estate Investments
Expert Advice on Networking Your Business
10 Things You Should Know About Pasquali Law




Employees, Privacy, & Computers


Some employers provide computers for work at home. Does the employee have a right to privacy in personal data stored on those computers? No, not if the employee agreed to a company policy which restricted equipment use and allowed for company monitoring.          

An insurance company executive was given two computers, one for his office and one to work at home. He was fired when the company found that he’d been using his office computer to browse pornography.          

The employee sued for wrongful termination. He said that the real reason for firing was money. The executive was fired less than a week before vesting in his second of three annual stock purchase agreements. The first stock purchase yielded the executive $1.2 million. According to the employee, the pornographic websites just “popped up” on the office computer, he denied visiting them intentionally. The company demanded return of the home computer. The employee resisted, offering to buy it instead. No dice, responded the employer, whose lawyers cautioned that “nothing should be deleted from the machine’s hard drive.” The home based computer contained the employee’s tax returns, family letters, and personal financial information. Wanting “everything” stored on the computer was just part of what the employee claimed was a “scorched earth” way of defending his lawsuit. The former executive asserted his constitutional right to privacy.          

The company said that showing him to be an x-rated web-surfer was the whole point! If he visited sexually explicit websites on his computer at home, then the visits at work were not accidental. Besides, they claimed, this employee gave up his right to privacy. He’d signed a monitoring agreement stating that the computers were: (1) Company Property; (2) To be used only for Company Business; (3) Never to be used for “improper, derogatory, defamatory, obscene or other inappropriate purposes;” and (4) Subject to company monitoring “as needed.” The court ordered the equipment’s return, with limited safeguards for the employee’s personal data.          

Employees who are offered take-home equipment and a monitoring agreement now have two choices: (A) Refuse to sign and don’t take employer-owned equipment; or (B) Accept the employer’s property, knowing full well that they’ve given up their right to privacy. Once a properly drafted policy is signed: “The employee may have his cake and eat it too-he can avoid any invasion of his privacy by using his computer for business purposes only, and not for anything personal.” TBG Insurance vs. Superior Court, L.A. (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 443

The Pasquali law office is here to help.

Pasquali Law

(415) 841-1000 -or- (650) 579-0100

e-mail: info36@lawsuite.net

1220 Howard Avenue - Burlingame, California

Representing employers and employees in cases of theft of trade secret, unfair competition, theft from business, trade liable, violations of duty of loyalty, and California Unfair Competition Act. Serving the cities of San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, Fremont, Antioch, Berkeley, Concord, Daly City, Fairfield, Hayward, Richmond, Santa Clara, Santa Rosa, Sunnyvale, Vallejo, Alameda, Alamo, Albany, American Canyon, Ashland, Bay Point, Belmont, Benicia, Blackhawk-Camino Tassajara, Brentwood, Campbell, Capitola, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Clayton, Cupertino, Danville, Dixon, Dublin, East Palo Alto, El Cerrito, El Sobrante, Foster City, Gilroy, Half Moon Bay, Healdsburg, Hercules, Hillsborough, Hollister, Lafayette, Larkspur, Live Oak, Livermore, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Martinez, Menlo Park, Mill Valley, Millbrae, Milpitas, Moraga, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Napa, Newark, North Bay, Novato, Oakley, Orinda, Pacifica, Palo Alto, Peninsula, Petaluma, Piedmont, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Pleasanton, Redwood City, Rohnert Park, San Anselmo, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Leandro, San Lorenzo, San Mateo, San Pablo, San Rafael, San Ramon, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, Scotts Valley, South Bay, South San Francisco, Stanford, Suisun City, Tamalpais-Homestead Valley, Union City, Vacaville, Walnut Creek, Watsonville, Windsor, and Marin County, San Francisco County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Monterey County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, and Napa County